01
Compare the right variant.
Keep part configuration and software revision beside the controller’s test version.
INDUSTRIES / AUTOMOTIVE & EV
Connect controller programming, interface checks, and final functional tests to the same serial number. Compare vehicle variants, software revisions, and production stations without losing the original test evidence.

01
Keep part configuration and software revision beside the controller’s test version.
02
Link incoming boards and modules to their finished assembly.
03
Preserve initial failures when rework or a retest produces a pass.
WORKFLOW EXAMPLE
An illustrative controller workflow combining configuration checks, interface measurements, and yield review across equivalent production units.
Controller on the end-of-line bench
Keep the controller serial, hardware variant, and programmed software identifier with the run.
Record bus communications, I/O responses, and supply-current measurements on the bench.
Compare first-pass results by station and variant, with individual failed runs available to inspect.
Open the affected runs with the production engineer. Compare station, supplier batch, and software revision, then agree the next diagnostic check and any containment decision.
Connect the next stepRESOURCES
Connect the software identifier and configured variant to the serialized controller.
PROCEDURE IDEA · EXAMPLEBring bus, I/O, and supply measurements into a structured end-of-line result.
PROCEDURE IDEA · EXAMPLELearn how to manage test data for autonomous vehicles and robotics systems using TofuPilot's multi-stage test tracking and sensor data storage.
PRACTICAL GUIDEBring one procedure and a representative set of results. We’ll help you plan the first integration.